Posting to Tumblr

Please go to my Tumblr site for my recent updates, photos and links. There is also an RSS feed of my Tumblr posts on the right side of this page.
-Patty

Posted in delights | Leave a comment

Try Readability

ReadabilityTired of reading articles online that are crowded with clutter like ads, twitter posts and comments? Try the Readability bookmarklet for Firefox, Flock, Safari and Chrome. Once installed, you can click the bookmarklet whenever you are on a page with article text, and you will see a simplified version of the article with larger text but no clutter. You can adjust the font-family, font size, margins and more before creating your bookmarklet. I love it!

Posted in delights, web 2.0 | Leave a comment

4 8 15 16 23 42 (Lost)

OK. It’s wasn’t “all a dream” – or even purgatory. It was about convincing a man of science that that the only things in life of any importance are his relationships with others. That he, indeed, doesn’t need to die alone.

It was fitting that Desmond turned out to be the main purveyor of this knowledge, since he was the first to resolve his internal conflict and be reunited with his true love (his phone call to Penny in the fourth season will always be the most thrilling moment of the entire series in my mind). But was it fitting that Desmond removed the – for lack of a better word – “plug stone,” causing Jack to replace it in order to save the island from nonexistent destruction? That seemed quite superfluous to me. The light was on, then it was off, then it came back on, and it never mattered to begin with. OK.

Also fitting was the absence of Michael amongst the other major players in the series finale, since he did not resolve his fatherhood conflict before he “died.” But it would have been nice – though impossible – to see Michael’s son Walt there – certainly more so than the repugnant Shannon. And fitting, too, that Ben did not join the rest of the cast in the church, since he had only ever caused them pain (and received the same in return). I found myself once again exclaiming “Leave him to die!” when, after being trapped by a tree during an earthquake, the other characters tried to save Ben. What did he ever do to deserve that?

I felt better about the show’s treatment of Locke after the finale. He was my favorite character throughout the show, and I didn’t think it fair when they killed him off and then made him evil incarnate for the final season. But in the end, he as a symbol of faith versus Jack as a symbol of science reigned, proving that the island’s “good versus evil,” “Jacob versus the Man In Black” dichotomy was only a distraction for Jack.

You can view the “nothing matters except our love for each other” theme as a cop-out, since it allowed the writers and producers to leave so many questions unanswered, but to me it was a bit of tidy proof that even though they did not have the entire show scripted from the very beginning, they knew why the survivors were REALLY on the island, and how it would end.

And so I retract my threat to drive to the homes of the producers and shoot out the porch lights if they didn’t explain what the numbers mean. I only hope that I can now forget them.

Posted in delights, rants | Leave a comment

Compliance Foiled – Again

A months or so ago we launched a new SPH homepage. It is much cleaner, more flexible and more compliant with web standards. But there is one problem. The design does not contain places for level-two heading for each section of the page.  Only the “In the News” section contains an actual heading.

This is a problem semantically, as well as for the accessibility of the page. When we look at the page, we know that the social media icons all grouped together form a section of the page. We can tell that because the icons all look similar and are placed together. But someone who cannot see our page, but instead has it read aloud to them, would have no way of knowing that. They would just suddenly hear “Link to http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ann-Arbor-MI/University-of-Michigan-School-of-Public-Health/13345778541?ref=mf title Find UM SPH on Facebook.” While this may not seem like such a bad thing, it goes against the whole idea of pages needing to be machine-readable in addition to being well-designed aesthetically.

To resolve this I placed the missing headings in the code (Navigation, SPH feature, SPH in Social Media, and Hot Topics) and used CSS to hide their display. I’ve tried this before and had the same thing happen: someone calls me or emails me to say they see the headings on the page and it “looks funny.”

I used the following CSS to hide these headings:

visibility:hidden;
display:none;
position:absolute;
top:-900px;
left:-900px;

One would think that this would work, but it didn’t. The headings weren’t visible to me in any browser, but two important stake holders emailed me to say they could see them.  So I ended up commenting them out. This is certainly far less than ideal. I am stumped.

Posted in rants, web dev | Leave a comment

Getting There…

via Getting There….

Follow writer and photographer Bob Fox on his Prairie Schooner journey

Posted in delights | Leave a comment

The Gym in January

I didn’t have time to go to the gym this morning, so I went after work. Big mistake. First off, I had to park way across the parking lot in front of Secretary of State. As I was backing out to straighten my car, I hit a guy going behind me. Neither of us were going fast and I only dented in his door a little bit. I DID look before I backed out. He must have seen me backing up and come anyway.I gave him my phone number.

Then I made it into the gym and it was completely packed! I have never seen so many people in there.  There were only a two eliptical trainer machines open, and they have like 30 of them.

What the hell? Did everyone in Ann Arbor/Ypsi resolve to lose weight this year? Or did everyone discover how great Planet Fitness is all of a sudden? Maybe both.

Posted in rants | Leave a comment

Brizzly – Web-Based Twitter/Facebook Client

Today Twitter told me about Brizzly, a new web-based client for Twitter and Facebook users. You connect your Twitter and Facebook accounts to Brizzly and it displays updating content in an auto-refreshing column. You can only view Twitter OR Facebook at a time, but switching back and forth between them is quick and easy. Here are some things I like about Brizzly:

  • Since Brizzly is web based, it’s easy to make the text larger so that old folks like me can read it from afar.
  • Shortened links are displayed as they were originally entered, so you know what sites you are going to when you click them.
  • Photos and videos are displayed inline without having to click to another page. You can also upload them via Brizzly.
  • Direct message are displayed in a IM-like notification, are threaded, and have the option to “view” or “shh” it.
  • You can maintain your twitter lists, searches and even temporarily mute tweeters you follow.
  • Seeing a tweeter’s bio is as easy as a clicking a question mark icon.
  • Twitter trends are displayed in the right column and explanations for them are not only accessible, but editable.
  • And of course, it is easy to tweet, reply and retweet, and to post and comment/like on Facebook.

I’ve been comparing what I see displayed on Facebook vs Brizzly, and so far nothing has been missing (although I am still completely mystified about the difference between “Home” and “Live Feed” on Facebook. Don’t get me started on that!). So far I haven’t seen anything on Brizzly to indicate that it is contact-based. In other words, I don’t need to be “friends” with people on Brizzly in order to see their posts, like with some other services. That may be added later.

Here’s a Brizzly tutorial.

Posted in web 2.0 | Leave a comment